Skip to main content

10 posts shown

  1. Five of us build swamp. None of us write code. Agents write it, review it, test the binary. The work didn't shrink — it shifted to the decisions that were always the most valuable.

    by @stack72

  2. Five people, $3,000/month, zero lines written manually. GitHub just moved to per-token billing. The era of flat-rate pricing absorbing your agent's inefficiency is ending. Your agent isn't the…

    by @stack72

  3. The PR-as-contribution model was built for a world where writing code was the bottleneck. AI agents broke that assumption. GitHub shipped a kill switch on PRs. Hashimoto built Vouch. We closed the…

    by @stack72

  4. Encoding judgment the agent lacks into AWS operations

    by @webframp

  5. Mechanical friction is dissolving, but do not mistake easy for simple

    by @webframp

  6. We use swamp to build swamp. That sounds like marketing until you look at how an issue actually moves through our process — not as a GitHub thread with comments piling up, but as a state machine with…

    by @stack72

  7. Skills are context. They're the thing an agent reads before it decides how to use swamp. If the skills are wrong, everything downstream is wrong — so we test them in CI the same way we test code,…

    by @stack72

  8. Agents open PRs in our repo. Other agents review them. That means untrusted input flowing through models with merge authority — so we built a pipeline with four independent AI reviews, scoped tools,…

    by @stack72

  9. Every release binary gets dispatched to a separate repo running CLI tests, adversarial security tests, and benchmarks. Three recent bugs — all with full unit test suites passing — never reached a…

    by @stack72

  10. Most people hit "always allow" within the first hour. Agent trust is a system design problem, not a containment problem. Three layers of permissions, conventions, and context let the agent work…

    by @stack72